Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://dx.doi.org/10.34960/283
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorScory, Serge-
dc.contributor.authorPaleco, Carole-
dc.contributor.authorCasino, Ana-
dc.contributor.authorAlonso, Eva-
dc.contributor.authorKoureas, Dimitris-
dc.contributor.authorLoo, Tina-
dc.contributor.authorMergen, Patricia-
dc.contributor.authorNivart, Anne-
dc.contributor.authorDusoulier, François-
dc.contributor.authorDemanoff, Vanessa-
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-03T15:20:27Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-03T15:20:27Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.urihttps://know.dissco.eu/handle/item/473-
dc.description.abstractAs an aspiring world-class research infrastructure DiSSCo needs to develop within a very well defined and stable organisational framework. During the current preparatory phase, an interim governance model has been put in place, aiming mainly at ensuring a correct alignment and use of synergies amongst all the projects shaping the future of DiSSCo. As part of these efforts, a dedicated work package (WP7) of the H2020 DiSSCo Prepare project aims at uplifting the organisational aspects to their highest implementation readiness level. In this context the present milestone explores the various legal entity models that DiSSCo could adopt to secure its sustainability. First the main characteristics of six legal entity models are documented and analysed. From this analysis the most suitable models are short-listed, reducing the choice to three possible candidates: an International Organization, an ERIC or an AISBL. Then a detailed, comparative, analysis is performed. Based on this study, we make the proposal to consider establishing DiSSCo as an ERIC as the best option, taking into account that adequate mechanisms need to be implemented to allow a prominent role for CETAF. In this context the present milestone explores the various legal entity models that DiSSCo could adopt to secure its sustainability. First the main characteristics of six legal entity models are documented and analysed. From this analysis the most suitable models are short-listed, reducing the choice to three possible candidates: an International Organization, an ERIC or an AISBL. Then a detailed, comparative, analysis is performed. Based on this study, we make the proposal to consider establishing DiSSCo as an ERIC as the best option, taking into account that adequate mechanisms need to be implemented to allow a prominent role for CETAF.en_US
dc.subjectLEGALen_US
dc.subjectENTITYen_US
dc.subjectMODELen_US
dc.subjectGOVERNANCEen_US
dc.subjectLANDSCAPEen_US
dc.subjectANALYSISen_US
dc.subjectERICen_US
dc.subjectAISBLen_US
dc.titleMS-7.2 Analysis of the legal entity models and their suitability for achieving DiSSCo objectivesen_US
dc.readinessData Readinessen_US
Appears in the Folders:DPP Work Package 7 - Governance, Policy & Legal frameworks

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
DPP_WP7_MS7.2 _DiSSCo Legal Entity proposal (incl. Annex).pdf3.89 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.